The Cauvery Water Dispute: Resumed Conversations in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka
The Cauvery water dispute has once again surged to the forefront of discussions, rekindling tensions between the states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. As Tamil Nadu appeals to the Supreme Court of India, seeking intervention to ensure a steady flow of 24,000 cubic feet per second (cusec) from its reservoir, the dispute continues to captivate the nation's attention. This article delves into the recent developments, historical context, and the intricate details of the ongoing Cauvery water dispute.
 |
| 'Cauvery water dispute' resumed in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka |
A Renewed Fervor: Tamil Nadu's Plea
Tamil Nadu's fervent plea to the Supreme Court underscores the critical nature of the Cauvery water dispute. The state's appeal emphasizes the urgency of maintaining a consistent flow of 24,000 cusec from its reservoir. Additionally, Tamil Nadu has urged the court to instruct Karnataka to adhere to the allocation of 36.76 TMC (thousand million cubic feet) for September 2023, as stipulated by the final decision of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT).
Karnataka's Standpoint
Karnataka's response to Tamil Nadu's appeal has been marked by a steadfast adherence to its position. Despite Tamil Nadu's crisis-sharing formula, Karnataka has rejected the demand, emphasizing its commitment to the welfare of its own citizens. The Karnataka Cauvery catchment area has reported approximately 44% rainfall in Kodagu from June to August, further adding to the complexities of the situation.
The Delicate Balance: Allocation and Rainfall
The allocation of water from the Cauvery river has long been a contentious issue. The CWDT's final decision in 2007 aimed to strike a balance between the four coastal states—Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, and Puducherry. The allocation was determined as follows: Tamil Nadu - 404.25 TMC, Karnataka - 284.75 TMC, Kerala - 30 TMC, and Puducherry - 7 TMC. However, the intricacies of managing this allocation amidst varying rainfall patterns have posed continuous challenges.
Monsoon Dynamics and Disputes
The monsoon season holds a significant role in the Cauvery water dispute. The southwest monsoon, from June to September, coincides with the allocation of 123.14 TMC to Tamil Nadu. Unfortunately, this period also witnesses instances of less-than-anticipated rainfall. The clash between the allocation schedule and the actual monsoon dynamics has led to recurring tensions between the states.
Historical Roots of Discontent
The roots of the Cauvery water dispute trace back to nearly 150 years. The years 1892 and 1924 witnessed mediation agreements between the Madras Presidency and Mysore, setting the stage for subsequent conflicts. The dispute gained momentum in 1974, post-independence, when Karnataka began diverting water without the consent of Tamil Nadu.
A National Resource and Management Measures
In 2018, the Supreme Court made a pivotal declaration, recognizing the Cauvery river as a national property. This decision paved the way for the formation of the 'Cauvery Water Management Authority' and the 'Cauvery Water Regulation Committee.' The Central Government's 'Cauvery Water Management Scheme,' established in June 2018, aimed to implement effective management measures to ensure equitable distribution.
Conclusion
The Cauvery water dispute remains an intricate tangle of legal, environmental, and socio-political complexities. The recent appeal by Tamil Nadu once again highlights the urgency of finding a sustainable solution to the dispute. As rainfall patterns continue to fluctuate and states contend for their rightful shares, the need for collaborative and innovative approaches to water management becomes increasingly evident.
FAQs
1. What triggered the Cauvery water dispute?
The dispute originated in 1974 when Karnataka began diverting water from the Cauvery river without the consent of Tamil Nadu.
2. What is the historical context of the dispute?
Mediation agreements between the Madras Presidency and Mysore in 1892 and 1924 laid the groundwork for the dispute, which gained momentum post-independence.
3. How was the Cauvery water allocation determined?
The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) in 2007 allocated water among four states: Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, and Puducherry.
4. How has the monsoon impacted the dispute?
The southwest monsoon season coincides with water allocation, often leading to conflicts when rainfall is less than anticipated.
5. What management measures have been taken?
The 'Cauvery Water Management Authority' and 'Cauvery Water Regulation Committee' were established in 2018 to manage the equitable distribution of Cauvery water.
